目????录
粤港澳大湾区民商事多元纠纷解决机制相关问题研究 001
一、非诉讼方面 003
二、诉讼方面 009
《仲裁法》修订前沿问题探析 013
一、临时仲裁制度尚存客观瓶颈待突破 015
二、仲裁庭自裁管辖权制度修订细节待商榷 022
三、临时措施决定的执行效力问题有待解决 025
四、仲裁司法审查机制有待完善 032
结 语 039
仲裁司法审查中的价值选择问题探析 040
一、问题的提出 040
二、仲裁协议效力司法审查的价值选择 042
三、仲裁裁决司法审查的价值选择 053
四、
仲裁司法审查价值选择对有效衔接与协调多元化纠纷解决
机制的实际功用 058
结?语 060
最密切联系原则纳入仲裁协议法律适用之证成 061
一、最密切联系原则与涉外仲裁协议法律适用之渊源 063
二、“隐名”适用有效性原则下最密切联系原则之新解 065
三、必要性：作为法律选择理由的最密切联系原则 068
四、可行性：最密切联系原则与有效性原则“互动”之可能 072
结 语 074
第三方资助国际商事仲裁法律问题研究 075
引 言 075
一、第三方资助国际商事仲裁的内涵与发展 076
二、规制第三方资助国际商事仲裁的必要性 078
三、第三方资助国际商事仲裁的国际规制经验探究 082
四、第三方资助国际商事仲裁在中国的发展路径 085
结 论 091
东北亚仲裁发展观察 092
中国篇 092
一、扬帆四海 093
二、改弦更张 093
三、创新与展望 095
俄罗斯篇 095
一、悠久的商事仲裁传统 096
二、2015年仲裁改革的背景 097
三、现行俄罗斯仲裁法的主要特点 098
四、俄罗斯目前主要的商事仲裁机构 103
五、俄罗斯商事仲裁实践中需要注意的几个问题 105
蒙古国篇 110
一、介绍 110
二、现代蒙古国仲裁法与法律规制解决 113
三、修订后的仲裁法 114
结 语 118
朝鲜篇 119
一、立法背景 120
二、主要内容 121
三、对于朝鲜仲裁管辖权的思考 127
四、《朝鲜涉外经济仲裁法》存在的一些问题 131
结?语 133
韩国篇 135
一、韩国仲裁产业政策导向及现状 135
二、仲裁产业化导向下韩国仲裁法制建设 140
结?语 149
日本篇 150
引?言 150
一、日本司法机关对仲裁裁决进行司法审查的制度概要 153
二、日本司法机关对仲裁裁决进行司法审查的判例运用 161
结?语 165
试论以集团公司名义订立仲裁协议的效力扩张 166
一、基本案情 166
二、问题的提出 167
三、以集团公司名义订立仲裁协议效力扩张的理论适用分析 169
四、我国以集团公司订立仲裁协议效力扩张的法律制度完善 180
结 论 184
商事仲裁中逾期提交证据涉及的若干法律问题研究 185
一、研究逾期提交证据具有重要意义 186
二、“逾期提交证据”与“违反仲裁规则”的关系 188
三、逾期提交证据，与证据持有人故意隐瞒证据（及撤销裁决
之间）的关联性 193
四、对于仲裁庭擅自接受一方当事人逾期提交的证据，对方
当事人如何正确应对？ 195
五、关于逾期提交证据的立法建议 196
CONTENTS
Studies About Issues Related to the ADR Mechanism on Civil and
Commercial Disputes in the Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater
Bay Area 201
Ⅰ. Non-litigation 204
Ⅱ. Litigation 215
An Analysis of Frontier Issues in the Amendment of Arbitration Law 220
Ⅰ. There are Objective Bottlenecks in the Ad Hoc Arbitration
System to be Broken Through 223
Ⅱ. The Details of the Revision of Competence-Competence Need
to be Discussed 235
Ⅲ. Unresolved Issue of Effectiveness of the Enforcement of
Decisions on Interim Measures 239
Ⅳ. The Judicial Review Mechanism for Arbitration Needs to be Improved 250
Conclusion 261
The Analysis of the Value Option for Judicial Review for Arbitration 262
Ⅰ. Formulation of the Question 263
Ⅱ. Value Options for Judicial Review of the Validity of Arbitration
Agreements 265
Ⅲ. Value Options for Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards 284
Ⅳ. Practical Utility of the Value Choice of Judicial Review of Arbitration for the Effective Articulation and Coordination of Diversified Dispute Resolution Mechanisms 293
Conclusion 296
The Choice of Law of the Arbitration Agreement: New Approach Towards
the Application of the Closest Connection Principle 297
Ⅰ. The Closest Connection Principle as a Source of Choice of
Law for Foreign-related Arbitration Agreements 300
Ⅱ. Noval Framework for Application of the Closest Connection
Principle Under the Hidden Pro-validation Approach 304
Ⅲ. Necessity: the Closest Connection Principle as Basis for Choice
of Laws 308
Ⅳ. Feasibility: Bridging the Validation Principle with the Closest Connection Principle 314
Conclusion 317
Study on the Legal Issues of the Third Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 318
Introduction 318
Ⅰ. The Connotation and Development of Third Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 319
Ⅱ. Necessity of Regulating Third Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 323
Ⅲ. Exploration of International Regulation Experience of Third
Party Funding for International Commercial Arbitration 328
Ⅳ. Development Path of Third Party Funded International
Commercial Arbitration in China 333
Conclusion 342
Observations on the Developments of Arbitration in Northeast Asia 344
China 345
Ⅰ. Worldwide Routes 345
Ⅱ. Setting the Sails 346
Ⅲ. Innovation and Outlook 348
Russia 348
Ⅰ. A Long Tradition of Commercial Arbitration 349
Ⅱ. Background of the 2015 Arbitration Reform 351
Ⅲ. Features of the Arbitration Law of Russian 353
Ⅳ. Current Main Commercial Arbitration Institutions in Russia 359
Ⅴ. Issues to be Noticed in the Practice of Commercial Arbitration
in Russia 363
Mongolia 369
Introduction 369
Ⅰ. Modern Mongolian Arbitration Law and Legal Regulation
Settlement 375
Ⅱ. The Revised Arbitration Law 376
Conclusion 382
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 383
Ⅰ. Legislation Background 384
Ⅱ. Main Contents 385
Ⅲ. Reflections on the DPRK Jurisdiction of Arbitration 396
Ⅳ. Problems of the Foreign Economic Arbitration Law of the
DPRK 402
Conclusion 405
Republic of Korea 407
Ⅰ. Industrial Policy Orientation and Current Status of the Arbitration
of Republic of Korea 407
Ⅱ. Legal System Construction of Arbitration of Republic of Korea
Under the Orientation of Arbitration Industrialization 414
Conclusion 429
Japan 430
Introduction 430
Ⅰ. Summary of the Judicial Review System of Arbitral Awards by Japanese Judicial Organs 434
Ⅱ. The Application of Judicial Review in the Judicial Precedents
of Arbitral Awards by Japanese Judicial Organs 447
Conclusion 453
Study on the Expansion of the Validity of Arbitration Agreements
Concluded in the Name of a Group Company 455
Ⅰ. Basic Facts 456
Ⅱ. Problems Raised 457
Ⅲ. Analysis of the Application of Theory to the Expansion of the Validity of Arbitration Agreements Concluded in the Name of
a Group Company 459
Ⅳ. Improvement of the Legal System for the Expansion of the
Validity of Arbitration Agreements Concluded by Group
Company in China 477
Conclusion 483
Studies on the Production of Evidence After the Expiry of the Time Period
in Commercial Arbitration 484
Ⅰ. Significance of Studies on Production of Evidence After the
Expiry of the Time Period 485
Ⅱ. The Relationship Between “Producing Evidence After the Expiry
of the Time Period” and “ Violation of Arbitration Rules” 489
Ⅲ. The Connection Between the Evidence Produced After the Expiry
of the Time Period and the Deliberate Concealment of Evidence
by the Holder (and Setting Aside the Arbitration Award) 497
Ⅳ. How to Correctly Deal with the Arbitral Tribunal’s Arbitrary Admission to the Evidence Produced by the Other Party After
the Specified Time Period 499
Ⅴ. Legislative Proposals on Legal Issues concerning Evidence
Produced After the Expiry of the Time Period 501
