中国博士生学术英语写作元话语研究(英文版)

“清华大学优秀博士学位论文丛书”（以下简称“优博丛书”）精选自2014年以来入选的清华大学校级优秀博士学位论文（Top 5%）。每篇论文经作者进一步修改、充实并增加导师序言后，以专著形式呈现在读者面前。“优博丛书”选题范围涉及自然科学和人文社会科学各主要领域，覆盖清华大学开设的全部一级学科，代表了清华大学各学科很优秀的博士学位论文的水平，反映了相关领域近期新的科研进展，具有较强的前沿性、系统性和可读性，是广大博硕士研究生开题及撰写学位论文的推荐参考，也是科研人员快速和系统了解某一细分领域发展概况、近期新进展以及创新思路的有效途径。

本书基于元话语广义人际模式以及狭义反身模式，提出适用于学术论文写作语篇的元话语分类模式，即元语篇、信息引导式以及人际互动式元话语的三维分类模式。其中，每一维度都是一个层级体，体现元话语在篇章中的不同功能。基于此模式尝试探究中国理工科博士生英语学术写作元话语的使用特征，及其与相关领域英文期刊论文中元话语的使用差异。

Chapter 1Introduction
1.1Rationale of the Study
1.2Research Objectives and Questions
1.3Significance of the Research
1.4Thesis Overview
Chapter 2Literature Review
2.1Theoretical Studies on Metadiscourse
2.1.1Definition of Metadiscourse
2.1.2Features of Metadiscourse
2.1.3Categorizations of Metadiscourse
2.2Empirical Studies on Metadiscourse in Academic Writing
2.2.1Metadiscourse in Research Articles
2.2.2Metadiscourse in ESL/EFL Student Writing
2.3Research Gap
2.4Summary
Chapter 3Analytical Framework of the Present Research
3.1Working Definition of Important Terms
3.1.1Defining Discourse
3.1.2Defining Academic Writing
3.1.3Defining Metadiscourse
3.2Developing an Analytical Framework for the Present Study
3.2.1Reflexivity of Metadiscourse
3.2.2Writer-reader Interaction in Metadiscourse
3.2.3Analytical Model for the Present Study
3.3Classification of Metadiscourse
3.3.1Reflexivity： Metatext
3.3.2Writer-reader Interaction： Interactive Metadiscourse
3.3.3Writer-reader Interaction： Interactional Metadiscourse
3.4Summary
Chapter 4Methodology
4.1Data Collection
4.1.1Corpora
4.1.2Interview
4.2Data Coding
4.3Data Analysis
4.4Summary
Chapter 5Results and Discussion： Metatext
5.1General Distribution Patterns of Metatext
5.2Disciplinary Similarities and Differences Between the Two Corpora
5.3Metatext in Use
5.3.1Reference to Discourse Entities
5.3.2Reference to Discourse Acts
5.3.3Reference to Discourse Labels
5.4Summary
Chapter 6Results and Discussion： Interactive Metadiscourse
6.1General Distribution Patterns of Interactive Metadiscourse
6.2Disciplinary Similarities and Differences Between the Two Corpora
6.3Interactive Metadiscourse in Use
6.3.1Transition Markers
6.3.2Frame Markers
6.3.3Code Glosses
6.3.4Evidentials
6.4Summary
Chapter 7Results and Discussion： Interactional Metadiscourse
7.1General Distribution Patterns of Interactional Metadiscourse
7.2Disciplinary Similarities and Differences Between the Two Corpora
7.3Interactional Metadiscourse in Use
7.3.1Hedges
7.3.2Boosters
7.3.3Self-mentions
7.4Summary
Chapter 8Conclusions
8.1Major Findings
8.1.1General Patterns of Metadiscourse in the Two Corpora
8.1.2Disciplinary Similarities and Differences in Metadiscourse Between the Two Corpora
8.1.3Metadiscourse in Use
8.2Implications of the Study
8.2.1Theoretical Implications
8.2.2Methodological Implications
8.2.3Pedagogical Implications
8.3Limitations of the Study
8.4Suggestions for Future Studies
References
Appendix A Interactive and Interactional Metadiscourse Items Investigated
Appendix B Categories of the Three-dimensional Analytical Model with Examples
Appendix C Interview
后记